ADC Leaders Protest INEC, Demand Chairman’s Removal Over Alleged Bias

ADC Leaders Protest INEC, Demand Chairman’s Removal Over Alleged Bias Leaders of the opposition African Democratic Congress (ADC), led by former Senate President David Mark, have protested against Nigeria’s electoral umpire, accusing it of losing neutrality ahead of future elections and calling for sweeping reforms within the commission. The opposition figures demanded the removal of the chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Joseph Amupitan, alleging growing concerns over electoral fairness and institutional independence

At a press briefing, ADC leaders warned that Nigeria’s democratic system could face serious risks if public confidence in the electoral body continues to decline. According to the party leadership, recent political developments and administrative decisions by INEC have generated suspicion among opposition parties, prompting calls for urgent corrective measures. David Mark stressed that credible elections remain the cornerstone of democracy, urging Nigerians to remain vigilant and actively defend democratic institutions. He maintained that electoral neutrality must not only exist but must also be visibly demonstrated to restore citizens’ trust. The ADC leadership insisted that the continued stay of INEC chairman Joseph Amupitan could undermine confidence in upcoming electoral processes. They argued that leadership changes within the commission may be necessary to reassure political stakeholders and voters that elections would be conducted transparently and without political interference.

Opposition leaders warned that failure to address these concerns could deepen political tensions nationwide The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) also echoed reservations about INEC’s neutrality, signaling rare alignment among opposition groups over electoral integrity issues. Party officials noted that democratic stability depends on an independent electoral commission capable of acting without pressure from the ruling establishment or political interests. Reports indicate that a foreign lobbying firm has begun engaging policymakers in the United States to draw international attention to Nigeria’s electoral environment.

The initiative reportedly seeks diplomatic pressure and potential sanctions targeting individuals or institutions accused of undermining democratic processes. Analysts say the move reflects increasing willingness among opposition actors to internationalize domestic political disputes.

ADC leaders urged citizens, civil society organisations, and democratic stakeholders to remain peaceful but proactive in safeguarding Nigeria’s democracy. They emphasized that democratic participation, transparency, and accountability are essential ahead of future elections, warning that public silence could weaken democratic gains achieved over decades.

Political observers believe the growing dispute between opposition parties and INEC could shape Nigeria’s political landscape in the coming months, particularly as preparations for future electoral cycles intensify. The controversy highlights long-standing debates over electoral reforms, institutional independence, and the credibility of democratic governance in Africa’s largest democracy.