Human Rights Lawyer Frank Tietie Demands Release Of Detained

Human Rights Lawyer Frank Tietie Demands Release of Detained Okuama Leaders, Urges Due Process After 2024 Military Clash

Prominent human rights lawyer Frank Tietie has called for the immediate release of community leaders from Okuama who have been detained since a military operation in 2024. Tietie says the prolonged detention without fair trial undermines justice and violates fundamental human rights. Tietie, speaking on behalf of activists and civil society groups, said authorities must respect the rule of law and ensure that all arrested individuals are afforded due process. He emphasised that holding community leaders without speedy trial or transparent legal proceedings is a serious breach of constitutional rights and international human rights standards. The Okuama arrests stem from a violent military engagement in 2024, when security forces clashed with residents amid escalating tensions in the region. Dozens were taken into custody during the operation, including traditional and civic leaders whose detention has continued into 2026. Families and supporters have repeatedly raised concerns over the legality of the detentions and the lack of formal charges or access to lawyers for many of the detainees.

• The Federal Government to immediately review the cases
• Release of those held without charge
• Respect for citizens’ constitutional rights
• Accountability in all security operations

He warned that prolonged detentions without fair hearings erode public confidence in the justice system and fuel further unrest.

Okuama activists and human rights groups have staged demonstrations and written petitions demanding transparency and accountability. Many relatives of the detainees have expressed deep frustration over the lack of communication and legal recourse. “They have been held in detention for far too long without clear justification or fair trial,” said one family member who spoke on condition of anonymity. Legal experts say the matter highlights broader concerns over military authority, civilian protection, and the integrity of Nigeria’s judicial processes.

The case is seen as a test of the government’s commitment to uphold human rights while addressing security challenges.